Gubmint and How Gubmint Works

Once upon a time, the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert.  Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night." 

So they created a night watchman  position and hired a person for the job.

Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?"  So they created a planning department and hired two

What's actually behind Operation Cure-All? Is it just the FDA and FTC taking their power too far? Or is there a deeper, more baleful purpose to this campaign? Who are Codex Alimentarius?
How could a nation that prides itself in its liberty of speech, freedom of choice, and freedom of information be facing such severe limitations in health liberty and dietary supplements? Haven't the people made their will known? Failed to our government pass the dietary Supplement Health & Education Act of 1994 to insure our right to health supplements?
Indeed, our government did. The laws instituted to protect us are being ignored. And what's worse is that those laws are on the point of being replaced, if the powers that be have their way.


Behind the Codex Alimentarius Commission is the United nations and the World Health Organization working together with the enterprise pharmaceutical cartel and international banks.
Allowed the World Health Organization and the Food and agriculture Organization to develop a universal food code. Their purpose was to 'harmonize' laws for diet supplements worldwide and set global safety standards for the needs of increased trade. Pharmaceutical interests stepped in and began exerting their influence.
REAL GOALS OF CODEX This is to bring about international 'harmonization.' While worldwide harmony sounds benign, is that the real point of this plan? While the stated objective of Codex is to build one sided regulations for dietary additions in every country, the actual goal is to outlaw health products and information on vitamins and dietary additions, except those under their direct control. These rules would displace US domestic laws without the North American folks's voice or vote in the problem. north Americans gasp at the thought. It is going against everything America stands for. Many are convinced this can't be possible. The truth is, it is not only possible , it's needed by the Codex Alimentarius Haccp agreement. In fact, under the conditions of the Uruguay Round of GATT, which created the World Trade Organization, the U. S. This includes standards for diet supplements being developed by the United state's Codex Alimentarius Commission's board on nourishment and Foods for Special dietary Use.
The Uruguay Round Agreements carry explicit language obviously indicating that the U.S. Must harmonize to global standards :
'Members are fully responsible under this Agreement for the observance of all provisions.... Members shall formulate and implement positive measures and mechanisms supporting the observance of the provisions.... By aside from government bodies.' [WTO TBT Agreement at Article 3.5]'
to explain, the government must NOT ONLY CHANGE federal LAW, but must ALSO need state and local governments to modify their laws as well to be as agreed by world law.

When I start to distinguish the differences between caring and loving with people they at first think they are the same thing. The programming that we received was that our parents were punishing us because they loved us. "This will hurt me more than it will you" never really jived with me as a child. We were taught that caring was showing love.

I can begin by giving  a definition of the two in such a way as to show the differences.

Caring is based in the belief that the world is dangerous and that there is something to protect ourselves from. It is always seeing dangers and boogey men around the next corner. It is constantly calculating the next "bad" thing that will happen and attempting to stop it. Caring projects an unconscious fear onto whatever is cared about. Caring is selfish and wants to keep what it has. All judgment in caring is from that the point of view that the thing cared about is weak and cannot care for itself. YOU MUST MAKE THE THING CARED ABOUT A VICTIM BEFORE YOU CAN CARE ABOUT IT! Caring always uses contraction and less movement (death) as a solution for the thing cared for. Caring always feels bad and extends bad feelings to others even though it gives the appearance of being a "kind" or "good" person. It is totally inauthentic. Caring is possessive, arrogant, fearful, judgmental, controlling, forcing and restricting.

Love on the other hand is based in the belief that the world is safe and that there is nothing to protect ourselves from. It always sees the world as benign and perfect. It is constantly seeing the "good" side in everything. It allows for maximum movement and ability in the thing loved. Loving never is possessive. Loving allows anything to happen to itself or others. Loving is generous because loves' world is generous to it. Love totally realizes that it does not know what is best for anyone and so assumes that what is happening is best for everyone involved. Love assumes strength in everything that it encounters and gives strength and encouragement to the strength and possibility in the thing encountered. Love always feels good and extends that feeling to everything. Love is expansive. Love does not pretend to be kind to people, it is a natural occurrence for those around it that the loving person is kind. Loving does not worry about "what people will think" it allows for people to have all points of view. Love can "be with" anything. Love is powerful because it is the source of all power.

On page 132 of I, Reality and Subjectivity, the following question and answer can be found. 

Q. What is meant by the term "mystic"? 

A. The mystic knows, experiences, and identifies with the Self as both context and content, that is, context is content. The content of the ego is transitory and a product of perception and, like a movie, it has no independent existence. The content of perception is an automatic byproduct of positionality and goes hand in hand with the creation of the illusions of perception. Science is the authority of the linear domain and the Newtonian paradigm; the mystic is the authority of the nonlinear domain.

He is a Chief Master Sergeant in the USAF. As high as you can go in enlisted ranks (E-9)

John Gebhardt's wife, Mindy, said that this little girl's entire family was executed. The insurgents intended to execute the little girl also, and shot her in the head...but they failed to kill her. She was cared for in John's hospital and is healing up, but continues to cry and moan. The nurses said John is the only one who seems to calm her down, so John has spent the last four nights holding her while they both slept in that chair. The girl is coming along with her healing. He is a real Star of the war, and represents what America is trying to do.This, my friends, is worth sharing. Go for it!! You'll never see things like this in the news.  Please keep this going.  Nothing will happen if you don't, but the American public needs to see pictures like this and needs to realize that what we're doing over there is making a difference. Even if it is just one little girl at a time. 
James Gates U. S. Navy